A Modest Teaspoon for the Generous Tablespoon

"In my case I have been known to substitute a modest teaspoon [of butter] for the generous tablespoon.

Finally, I do think the way to a full and healthy life is to adapt the sensible system of "small helpings, no seconds, no snacking, and a little bit of everything." Above all--have a good time!

What a happy task you have set for yourself! The pleasures of the table are infinite. Toujours bon appétit!"

-Julia Child, Mastering the Art of French Cooking

I am LOVING my new cookbook! It's the gift that keeps on giving.

¡Hasta Luego!

It's Saturday, What?!

Hola guapos! It's Saturday, and I've finally broken my blog posting silence, and that can only mean one thing: my adventurous journey into the magical world of Harry Potter has come to a fantastic close. At approximately 4:10 this morning, I stood by Harry, Ron, and Hermione until the very end. I must say that I've never been so captivated by fictional characters like this in my life. For those of you who  have read Harry Potter, I'm sure you understand, and I'm glad to say that I'm now part of the club.

Now we all know I've been really absent this summer, and for that I apologize. But I'm back now, and I have so much to share with you guys. I actually wanted to mark my comeback with a bang, and by bang I mean gifts, and by gifts I mean a giveaway. BUT I haven't read a single one of your blogs in over a week, and I think I'll start there. But know this, I'll be back, bright and early Monday morning!


Until then..

¡Besos!

This Woman is Ruining My Life!

Talented heifer!

Do you know what I just did? I left work, with a big pile of "$hit to get done" on my desk, and ran to the library to return book 5 and check out book 6. I just got back to my office. There's sweat in my hair, I'm slightly winded and I'm also precariously behind schedule on that $hit that needs to get done in time for my meeting at 2pm. But I don't care, because I got book 6, which is mercifully short at 652 pages, and I'm that much closer to knowing how it all ends! I'm obsessed. I'm tired, and I definitely had to talk myself out a panic when I heard something go bump in the night just after I finished book 5 around 1am this morning. I'm not even going to pretend that I'm going to blog until I finish these books. And while I've fallen behind on your blogs before for less legitimate reasons, please know that I'll be back to your blogs as soon as I finish this quest, because at this point I can't stop myself. This is all I have time to say, gotta get back to my real job now!

Merry Friday!

Soap Box Wednesdays: Are they TRYING to make us sick?

It's baaaaack! After a unnecessarily long (read: I was being too lazy to do my research) hiatus, Soap Box Wednesdays has returned. Sorta.  I'll level with you, I'm pulling this SBW post out of my ass at the eleventyith [yeah, I'm making up numbers now] because I promised in my last post that I would deliver this week. And I hate breaking promises, so here goes.

Way back when, sometime last year, I cam across this article on yahoo titled, "7 Foods Experts Won't Eat". Of course I had to read it, because you know me, I'm convinced that a lot our modern "conveniences" in terms of our food culture is much to our detriment. Because this is a half-assed SBW post, but I think this is pretty crucial information that everyone should have, I'm going to share this informative article. Word for word. In school, they call it plagiarism. In blog world, they call it copy right infringement. In my world, I call it "I spent my researching time twirling around a pole, watching TV and sleeping, so I don't give a flying fuggity about copyrights, as long as I get something posted, and it's not like I said I wrote it sooo shazam!"

How healthy (or not) certain foods are—for us, for the environment—is a hotly debated topic among experts and consumers alike, and there are no easy answers. But when Prevention talked to the people at the forefront of food safety and asked them one simple question—“What foods do you avoid?”—we got some pretty interesting answers. Although these foods don’t necessarily make up a "banned” list, as you head into the holidays—and all the grocery shopping that comes with it—their answers are, well, food for thought:

1. Canned Tomatoes
The expert: Fredrick vom Saal, PhD, an endocrinologist at the University of Missouri who studies bisphenol-A.

The problem: The resin linings of tin cans contain bisphenol-A, a synthetic estrogen that has been linked to ailments ranging from reproductive problems to heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. Unfortunately, acidity (a prominent characteristic of tomatoes) causes BPA to leach into your food. Studies show that the BPA in most people's body exceeds the amount that suppresses sperm production or causes chromosomal damage to the eggs of animals. "You can get 50 mcg of BPA per liter out of a tomato can, and that's a level that is going to impact people, particularly the young," says vom Saal. "I won't go near canned tomatoes."

The solution: Choose tomatoes in glass bottles (which do not need resin linings), such as the brands Bionaturae and Coluccio. You can also get several types in Tetra Pak boxes, like Trader Joe's and Pomi.

2. Corn-Fed Beef
The expert: Joel Salatin, co-owner of Polyface Farms and author of half a dozen books on sustainable farming.

The problem: Cattle evolved to eat grass, not grains. But farmers today feed their animals corn and soybeans, which fatten up the animals faster for slaughter. More money for cattle farmers (and lower prices at the grocery store) means a lot less nutrition for us. A recent comprehensive study conducted by the USDA and researchers from Clemson University found that compared with corn-fed beef, grass-fed beef is higher in beta-carotene, vitamin E, omega-3s, conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), calcium, magnesium, and potassium; lower in inflammatory omega-6s; and lower in saturated fats that have been linked to heart disease. "We need to respect the fact that cows are herbivores, and that does not mean feeding them corn and chicken manure," says Salatin.

The solution: Buy grass-fed beef, which can be found at specialty grocers, farmers' markets, and nationally at Whole Foods. It's usually labeled because it demands a premium, but if you don't see it, ask your butcher.

3. Microwave Popcorn
The expert: Olga Naidenko, PhD, a senior scientist for the Environmental Working Group,

The problem: Chemicals, including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), in the lining of the bag, are part of a class of compounds that may be linked to infertility in humans, according to a recent study from UCLA. In animal testing, the chemicals cause liver, testicular, and pancreatic cancer. Studies show that microwaving causes the chemicals to vaporize—and migrate into your popcorn. "They stay in your body for years and accumulate there," says Naidenko, which is why researchers worry that levels in humans could approach the amounts causing cancers in laboratory animals. DuPont and other manufacturers have promised to phase out PFOA by 2015 under a voluntary EPA plan, but millions of bags of popcorn will be sold between now and then.

The solution: Pop natural kernels the old-fashioned way: in a skillet. For flavorings, you can add real butter or dried seasonings, such as dillweed, vegetable flakes, or soup mix.

4. Nonorganic Potatoes
The expert: Jeffrey Moyer, chair of the National Organic Standards Board

The problem: Root vegetables absorb herbicides, pesticides, and fungicides that wind up in soil. In the case of potatoes—the nation's most popular vegetable—they're treated with fungicides during the growing season, then sprayed with herbicides to kill off the fibrous vines before harvesting. After they're dug up, the potatoes are treated yet again to prevent them from sprouting. "Try this experiment: Buy a conventional potato in a store, and try to get it to sprout. It won't," says Moyer, who is also farm director of the Rodale Institute (also owned by Rodale Inc., the publisher of Prevention). "I've talked with potato growers who say point-blank they would never eat the potatoes they sell. They have separate plots where they grow potatoes for themselves without all the chemicals."

The solution: Buy organic potatoes. Washing isn't good enough if you're trying to remove chemicals that have been absorbed into the flesh.

5. Farmed Salmon
The expert: David Carpenter, MD, director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany and publisher of a major study in the journal Science on contamination in fish.

The problem: Nature didn't intend for salmon to be crammed into pens and fed soy, poultry litter, and hydrolyzed chicken feathers. As a result, farmed salmon is lower in vitamin D and higher in contaminants, including carcinogens, PCBs, brominated flame retardants, and pesticides such as dioxin and DDT. According to Carpenter, the most contaminated fish come from Northern Europe, which can be found on American menus. "You can only safely eat one of these salmon dinners every 5 months without increasing your risk of cancer," says Carpenter, whose 2004 fish contamination study got broad media attention. "It's that bad." Preliminary science has also linked DDT to diabetes and obesity, but some nutritionists believe the benefits of omega-3s outweigh the risks. There is also concern about the high level of antibiotics and pesticides used to treat these fish. When you eat farmed salmon, you get dosed with the same drugs and chemicals.

The solution: Switch to wild-caught Alaska salmon. If the package says fresh Atlantic, it's farmed. There are no commercial fisheries left for wild Atlantic salmon.

6. Milk Produced with Artificial Hormones
The expert: Rick North, project director of the Campaign for Safe Food at the Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility and former CEO of the Oregon division of the American Cancer Society

The problem: Milk producers treat their dairy cattle with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH or rBST, as it is also known) to boost milk production. But rBGH also increases udder infections and even pus in the milk. It also leads to higher levels of a hormone called insulin-like growth factor in milk. In people, high levels of IGF-1 may contribute to breast, prostate, and colon cancers. "When the government approved rBGH, it was thought that IGF-1 from milk would be broken down in the human digestive tract," says North. As it turns out, the casein in milk protects most of it, according to several independent studies. "There's not 100% proof that this is increasing cancer in humans," admits North. "However, it's banned in most industrialized countries."

The solution: Check labels for rBGH-free, rBST-free, produced without artificial hormones, or organic milk. These phrases indicate rBGH-free products.

7. Conventional Apples
The expert: Mark Kastel, former executive for agribusiness and codirector of the Cornucopia Institute, a farm-policy research group that supports organic foods

The problem: If fall fruits held a "most doused in pesticides contest," apples would win. Why? They are individually grafted (descended from a single tree) so that each variety maintains its distinctive flavor. As such, apples don't develop resistance to pests and are sprayed frequently. The industry maintains that these residues are not harmful. But Kastel counters that it's just common sense to minimize exposure by avoiding the most doused produce, like apples. "Farm workers have higher rates of many cancers," he says. And increasing numbers of studies are starting to link a higher body burden of pesticides (from all sources) with Parkinson's disease.

The solution: Buy organic apples. If you can't afford organic, be sure to wash and peel them first.

Here's what I think. *jumps on soap box*

Really, really, REALLY?! Way to fucking go US Department of Agriculture on looking out to protect the health and well being of the general public! Way to drop the ball food scientists!! Once again, did no one really think that dousing food, FOOD that people eat, feed their children, and nourish their unborn offspring with in synthetic chemicals was a BAD FUCKING IDEA?! OK, so maybe you can get a pass on the canned tomatoes thing. That doesn't necessarily set off those alarms in the minds of most. But as for the rest of this mess, SIDE EYE, SON! I'm cringing at the realization that I have probably consumed several thousand gallons of rBST laden milk in my lifetime, as I was and still am a cereal monster. Now you've got me worried that if I ever decide to host a parasite for 10 months get pregnant and bring a crumb snatcher or two into this world, I might not be able to do so without reproductive drama. And what about cancer? You know women of African descent have a higher death rate from breast cancer than their Caucasian counterparts, even though we have a lower incidence rate? And my grandmother has Alzheimer's, how are these chemicals contributing to my risks factors? SHIT! HELL! DAMN! I realize it does me no good to fret over what cannot be undone. So since reading this article, I've taken action, and I am 6 for 7 on avoiding these foods:

• I don't really eat canned anything, and from now on, will be paying a premium for jarred tomato paste for whenever I get around to making Nigerian food or pasta sauce.
• Corn fed beef is hard to avoid. I don't buy that much beef, but I like to eat at restaurants.The grass fed alternative is soo outrageously expensive that I've never bought it. So as of last month, I've decided to nix beef from my grocery lists, indefinitely. I don't eat it that much, so it's an easy sacrifice. It's not like it's bacon...
• I don't eat popcorn. Period
• Organic potatoes are hard to find. Contrary to popular belief, not all of the produce in Whole Check Foods is organic, which elicits yet another side eye from me. For the prices they charge, that's some bull shiggity! Same deal on Trader Joe's. Whose leg do I have to hump for some organic freaking potatoes?!
• I don't buy much seafood b/c you have to cook it like IMMEDIATELY, which if you remember from this fiasco, is not something I do, like, ever.
• Organic milk is expensive as shit, $3.49 for half a gallon! BUT I get the ultra pasteurized variety that lasts like a month, that way it's never wasted in the event of a temporary cereal drought.
• Organic apples are available from time to time, and since I only buy 3 or 4 at a time, the cost isn't prohibitive.

So there you have it señoras y señores*. Avoid these 7 foods like your life depends on it. Because, it kinda does...

*prepare yourself for frequent bouts of Spanglish on this blog, as I am learning Español via Rosetta Stone so I'm not the idiot Americano when I move to Barcelona in 16-24 months.

Soap Box Wednesdays: Artificial Sugars--No Bueno!

*Disclaimer*
If you are a consumer of sugar substitutes, you may find the following post slightly offensive. After thoughtful consideration, I decided to share the full spectrum of my feelings on this matter, which are quite negative. If you are consumer of these products, please don't take my ranting personally, I still have much love for you. However, as your friend (blog world or otherwise) I implore you to at the very least consider reducing or better yet eliminating these products from your diet. The world won't come to an end  and you probably won't gain 5 pounds if you consume real sugar every now and then. Just don't go the full Monty with the sugar, that's just not a good look.

"Artificial sweeteners are chemicals or natural compounds that offer the sweetness of sugar without as many calories. Because the substitutes are much sweeter than sugar, it takes a much smaller quantity to create the same sweetness. Products made with artificial sweeteners have a much lower calorie count than do those made with sugar. Artificial sweeteners are often used as part of a weight-loss plan or as a means to control weight gain." -Mayo Clinic

As long as I can remember, I've always hated artificial sugars. Back in my single digit age days, I learned early on the difference in taste and texture between the real lollipops and the "sugar free" lollipops at the bank [I loved going to the bank with my mom just for the lollipops]. I didn't understand the concept of an oxymoron at that age, but I knew that sugar free candy just wasn't right, and was personally offended by the very concept of if. Fast forwarded to my older and wiser self now, and that feeling has evolved into a philosophy of "There is no such thing as a chemically altered zero calorie sweetener that's good for you". Diet soda, diet cookies, sugar free ice cream...WRONG, WRONG, and WRONG! These man made concoctions are an offense to God and nature [and my discriminating pallet] and I'm not the only one who feels this way. There is a growing body of research that indicates that these products may actually make you gain weight and growing speculation that they can make you sick.

I've been meaning to talk about this topic for a while but never got around to it. So why blog about it now?  Well, yesterday I was reading one of my favorite blogs, Fired N' Fabulous, and she had a guest post called the Skinny Bitch Food Diary. So as I read this skinny bitch's food diary, I noticed a recurring theme that was PISSING ME OFF, sugar free EVERYTHING which completely conflicts with her philosophy of eating things that are "alive and come from the earth." Sucralose, aspartame, acesulfame K, and saccharin came out of some food mega business's chemistry lab, NOT THE DAMN EARTH. ::side bar:: This skinny bitch runs a minimum of 20 miles per week and and is a fitness instructor, yet her food diary seemed curiously low on the calories. When I was running 3-4 miles a week, I couldn't eat enough to keep my weight up. But then again, I have a very sensitive metabolism, so I can't really judge her on her obsession with salads and apparent disregard for meat. But again, that is fodder for another blog post. But I can judge the numerous offenses against food like sugar free syrup on her egg white oatmeal pancakes [no comment on those pancakes] fucking gross! I understand that syrup is essentially liquid sugar, but really, sugar free syrup?! Fuck outta here! OR better yet, just eat your pancakes with fresh fruit, and skip the syrup all together. If I can do it, and I'm a self admitted sugar monster, she can do it too! Then there was the sugar free coffeemate for her coffee. I'm a purist, So I prefer milk or cream to artificial coffeemate crap any day, so once again, no bueno. Two teaspoons of sugar should be more than adequate, but sugar substitutes are like 100 times sweeter than cane sugar, and your body gets used to that sort of sweetness. And finally she said to satisfy her occasional chocolate cravings, she'll mix a packet of sugar free hot cocoa mix with almond milk and banana. I'm admittedly biased against this one, b/c I hate banana, I hate almond milk, and I hate powdered hot chocolate mix. But again with the sugar free shit...side eye to this chick. SIDE EYE! But enough of my commentary, here's what the science says about artificial sugars.

Weight Gain 
Researchers have laboratory evidence that the widespread use of no-calorie sweeteners may actually make it harder for people to control their intake and body weight. Researchers at Purdue University found that rats on diets containing the artificial sweetener saccharin gained more weight than rats given sugary food. The rats whose diets contained artificial sweeteners appeared to experience a physiological connection between sweet tastes and calories, which drove them to overeat. According to ABC News' medical contributor Dr. Marie Savard,

"There's something about diet foods that changes your metabolic limit, your brain chemistry."

Though Savard said more research needs to be done to uncover more information, the study does hit at the idea that sweeteners alter a persons' metabolism. Dr. Savard goes on to say that another recent study, which included more than 18,000 people, found healthy adults who consumed at least one diet drink a day could increase their chance for weight gain.

"The taste buds taste sweet, but there's no calorie load that comes with it. There's a mismatch here. It seems it changes your brain chemistry in some way," Savard said. "Anything you put in your mouth, your body has a strong reaction to it. It's much more than counting calories. It seems normally with sweet foods that we rev up our metabolism"

A separate study came to similar conclusions. The findings come from eight years of data collected by Sharon P. Fowler, MPH, and colleagues at the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio. Fowler reported the data at the annual meeting of the American Diabetes Association in San Diego.

 "What didn't surprise us was that total soft drink use was linked to overweight and obesity," Fowler tells Web MD. "What was surprising was when we looked at people only drinking diet soft drinks, their risk of obesity was even higher."
"In fact, when the researchers took a closer look at their data, they found that nearly all the obesity risk from soft drinks came from diet sodas."

"There was a 41% increase in risk of being overweight for every can or bottle of diet soft drink a person consumes each day," Fowler says.

Please note, however, that due to the nature of scientific research, it has NOT been determined nor has the research claimed that there is a direct causal relationship between the use of artificial sugars and weight gain or obesity. But the research does indicate that there may be correlation between the two, and at the very least, the consumption of such products may alter your body's reactions to the sensation of sweet. As far as I'm concerned, that in itself in addition the fact that fake sugar tastes like ass, is reason enough for me to stay far FAR away from it.

Safety Concerns
The scientific community has not yet conceded that these products may be causing other harm to humans like cancer and M.S., but there's a plethora of that the wackadoodles and conspiracy theorists across the world wide web that think otherwise. Basically the science has said that in lab rats fed a ridiculous amount of various artificial sugars, cancers have been observed. But to extrapolate that data within the human population is unrealistic--according to the scientific community. However, I'll cite Dr. Savard once again,

"We have to rethink what this artificial stuff does to us. If we put this in water it might not be so good." 

For me, better safe than sorry. I was also going go off on a tangent about how very arrogant it is of our society to think they can one up nature give people an excuse to not moderate their intake of junk or scare the weight conscious into consuming altered "foods" in the name of health. But I think my comment about this being an offense against God and nature says it all.
I'll leave you with this last statement from the Mayo Clinic.

Just removing sugar from cookies and chocolates doesn't make them low-calorie, low-fat foods. If you eat too many, you'll still get more calories than you may need, and you may not get enough nutritious foods. Unlike fruits, vegetables and whole grains, sugar-free soft drinks, candy and desserts often provide few — if any — beneficial nutrients.